Thanks to Peter, who just sent me a very interesting article: "Honor Before Sex, Men Reveal in Survey."
I had missed this study, which was published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine in August, but after polling 27,839 men in eight countries, it turns out that "The male ideal of a 'man's man' is a guy who's responsible, honourable and a devoted partner, not one who's always on the prowl for sex or driven by his career, an international study says."
This topic has new relevance to me because I just participated in a
debate at Oxford about whether promiscuity is a virtue, and people keep asking me whether the affirmative team actually defended promiscuity as a virtue. The answer is no--they did not. What they argued was that if men can be promiscuous, so, too, should women. To which I replied that promiscuity was good for no one--but also, why are some feminists always bent on imitating the most immature, caddish male? If you're going to imitate men, why not imitate the honorable, faithful ones? (Of which there are many.)
Or better yet, why not simply be ourselves?
We did officially win the debate in case you were wondering. But this particular battle, I fear, is far from over.