I just happened to be browsing my Catechism of the Catholic Church (April 1995 version, imprimitur of Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict) and found several references to Modesty, which I thought I'd share:
Section 2521 - Purity requires modesty, an integral part of temperance. Modesty protects the intimate center of the person. It means refusing to unveil what should remain hidden. It is ordered to chastity to whose sensitivity it bears witness. It guides how one looks at others and behaves towards them in conformity with the dignity of persons and their solidarity.
Section 2522 - Modesty protects the mystery of persons and their love. It encourages patience and moderation in loving relationships; it requires that the conditions for the giving and commitment of man and woman to one another be fulfilled. Modesty is decency. It inspires ones choice of clothing. It keeps silence or reserve where there is evident risk of unhealthy curiosity. It is discreet.
Sectopn 2523 - There is a modesty of the feelings as well as of the body. It protests, for example, against the voyeuristic explorations of the human body in certain advertisements, or against the solicitations of certain media that go too far in the exhibition of intimate things. Modesty inspires a way of life that makes it possible to resist the allurements of fashion and the pressures of prevailing ideologies.
Section 2524 - The forms taken by modesty vary from one culture to another. Everywhere, however, modesty exists as an intuition of the spiritual dignity proper to man. It is born with the awakening concientiousness of being a subject. Teaching modesty to children and adolescents means awakening in them respect for the human person.
Hmm, these are rather lofty concepts. Clearly, the Church is not just being repressive and prudish. On the contrary, the Church is concerned with honoring one's inherent dignity, and protecting one's heart and soul.
Any thoughts or comments? Which is your favorite and why? My favorite is the first one above, that says modesty protects the intimate center of the person. The point of modest dressing is not to cover you up in dowdy clothing so you look like a baggy thing, but to be protective, it's almost a form of armour.
American culture is youth-oriented and says "If you've Got it, Flaunt It." What that line of thinking forgets is that when you flaunt "It," people tend to see "It" and not "You" in your entire being. When you flaunt it, what do you do for a follow-up? You've exposed it all, you've held nothing back. What our culture has lost sight of are the advantages of keeping something back, keeping treasures hidden and protected, holding things in reserve, revealing what we have only to those who we trust and who respect us.
I think what I love most here is the very first line from the Catechism that you quote: "Purity requires modesty, an integral part of temperance."
Purity and modesty are not the same thing, though one requires the other. You can certainly be modest without being pure. Also that modesty is part of "temperance" -- modesty is moderation. Modesty is not prudery but it is what temperance is: "moderation and self-restraint." This relates to both kinds of modesty that we commonly think of: modesty in clothing and modesty in view of oneself. To not brag about oneself you have to use self-retraint.
Like all virtues modesty is a mean between two extremes AND is linked to other virtues. Virtue begets virtue. Thanks, Mary.
Posted by: Alexandra Foley | January 02, 2006 at 09:17 AM
Hi...first I wanted to say, I've been reading this blog for a few weeks and loving it.
My favorite bit is the second paragraph, "Modesty protects the mystery of persons and their love." This, to me, is the most exciting and lovely part of the wohle idea...that there is some part of each person that is reserved for just one other. Giving and receiving that part, and holding it sacred, give a lot of meaning to life.
I was reading Christina Rossetti the other day (as I do often, she's my favorite poet) and noting all the ways that her writing reflects a beautiful innate sense of modesty - Goblin Market is maybe the most obvious, but so many of her assumptions just sparkle with something that's been lost. It is very refreshing to read, as are these verses from the catechism. For example:
"If love is not worth loving, then life is not worth living,
Nor aught is worth remembering, but well forgot.
For store is not worth storing and gifts are not worth giving,
If love is not;
"And idly cold is death-cold, and life-heat idly hot
And vain is any offering and vainer our receiving
And vanity of vanities is all our lot.
"Better than life's heaving heart is death's unheaving,
Better than the opening leaves are leaves that rot,
For there is nothing left worth achieving or retrieving,
If love is not."
She was right, of course, but to a modern eye, the poem is turned inside out. The assumption in modern culture IS that "love is not;" that lust is the driving force of everything. The middle verse, about vanity, is particularly telling, but to the modern eye, it looks like she's got cause and effect reversed. We embraced the "vanity of vanities" and lost love. Turns into a bit of a vicious circle.
Anyway, that's probably rambling a bit, but such are the thoughts your post inspires.
Posted by: Breanna | January 02, 2006 at 09:18 PM
Mary,
Thanks so much for sharing these thoughts from the Catechism. I remember when I first learned there was a Catholic Catechism and wow - what a Table of Contents! I think Pope John Paul II has done so much to expand on those points in "Theology of the Body" and "Love & Responsibility". It gives me great hope.
I'm really taken with the points about modesty guarding the "intimate center of the person" and modesty as temperance, moderation. Thank you!!
Posted by: Erin P | January 03, 2006 at 09:40 PM
I am a fifteen year-old girl writing a speech on modesty for my speech and debate class. I googled "modesty in thought" (I think that's what I typed...I've done a lot of googling over the few days;) but this link appeared on the second page and I clicked on it. This was very helpful. Thank you.
I think that the first one--modesty protects the intimate center of a person--is the one that is, in a sense, the most important and more people need to realize it. Fortunately I live in a fairly small town, so the extremely immodest and skin-bearing fashions aren't quite as popular...but they're still here. And they're apparent on the covers of magazines. I honestly don't think that many of these girls realize what they're doing when they dress in that manner. When you show that much skin, it leaves little to the imagination. Besides that, those guys who are attracted to you for dressing that way, do you REALLY want to get attention from them?
However, I also liked the third--modesty is of the feelings as well as the body. That is another side of modesty that I've been looking for, because I thought I might lose the interest of my judges if I rant on for ten minutes about feminine modesty and how Hollywood's not helping. ;)
So, again, I'm going to explore this a tad more (I'm not sure if you have many other entries like this, though I'm hoping), but I wanted to drop a quick note so you were aware that there was a highschool girl who appreciates you sharing your analyzing of this topic. Thanks again!
Posted by: katie | March 09, 2006 at 08:30 PM
Public School Teenagers Covering Up Too. I welcome your comments on my article on modesty.
Posted by: tznius-lady | July 17, 2008 at 04:39 PM